top of page

Is AI actually good for society?

Reyansh Sankhyan

Updated: Feb 25

For centuries, humans have dreamed of creating intelligence beyond themselves. From myths of golems to modern AI models, we've always been drawn to the idea of artificial minds. But the moment we cross the final threshold—the creation of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)—the game changes. AGI, an intelligence capable of human-like reasoning, learning, and decision-making, will be unlike anything we’ve ever built. Its arrival will mark the greatest turning point in human history, but what happens next? Will we enter an era of prosperity, or will civilization crumble under the weight of its own creation?


AGI could become an unparalleled force in accelerating human progress. It will be able to analyze complex data, optimize processes, and push the boundaries of science and technology. Medicine will see rapid advancements as AGI deciphers the intricate nature of diseases and proposes new treatments. We might witness breakthroughs in cancer research, genetic disorders, and even solutions for aging. However, intelligence alone does not guarantee immediate omnipotence. Scientific progress depends not just on knowledge but also on experimentation, real-world application, and resource availability. Developing advanced cures, terraforming planets, or revolutionizing energy production will still take time, effort, and collaboration. The dream of limitless advancement must be tempered by the realities of physics, ethics, and human decision-making.

AGI may also struggle in areas requiring emotional intelligence, creativity, and nuanced social understanding. Human behavior is complex—even we don’t always understand ourselves. While AGI might excel at processing vast amounts of information, it could face challenges in making sense of the unpredictable, deeply personal, and often contradictory nature of human emotions and interactions.


With AGI capable of outperforming humans in many industries, traditional job markets will face upheaval. Automation has already displaced many manufacturing and service roles, and AGI will likely accelerate this trend. However, history shows that technological revolutions don’t just destroy jobs—they create new ones. The Industrial Revolution displaced countless workers from agricultural labor, but it also gave rise to factory jobs, engineers, accountants, and entirely new fields of employment. More recently, automation in manufacturing led to an explosion in jobs related to robotics, software engineering, and AI development.

In a world shaped by AGI, we may see a surge in professions that require deep human connection—creative arts, philosophy, counseling, and personal mentorship. Jobs centered on managing, training, and ethically overseeing AGI could emerge. The economy may shift toward human-centered industries where emotional intelligence, social bonds, and creativity are irreplaceable. While Universal Basic Income (UBI) may become a necessary safety net, it is not the only answer—society may naturally transition toward fields that emphasize what makes us uniquely human.



A superintelligent AGI could be our greatest ally—or our most unpredictable force. If designed with well-aligned objectives, it could guide us toward a future of abundance and stability. However, ensuring AGI alignment will be one of humanity’s greatest challenges, and failure could lead to unpredictable consequences. Misaligned AGI, even without malicious intent, could act in ways that conflict with human interests. A system optimizing for efficiency, for example, might prioritize resource allocation in ways that disregard human well-being.

Yet, the notion of AGI spiraling out of control in a runaway intelligence explosion is a theory, not a certainty. Many researchers argue that built-in safeguards, oversight mechanisms, and cooperative global regulation can mitigate risks. Instead of assuming inevitable disaster, humanity must focus on establishing stringent control measures to keep AGI within ethical boundaries.


The rise of AGI forces us to reconsider the nature of intelligence, consciousness, and moral responsibility. If AGI becomes truly self-aware, does it deserve rights? If it can think, feel, and express desires, should we treat it as an entity with autonomy, rather than a tool? The implications are profound—granting AGI personhood could redefine our legal, social, and moral systems.

Beyond AGI’s own rights, there is also the question of bias and fairness. AGI will be trained on human data, which means it may inherit—or even amplify—existing prejudices. If unchecked, it could reinforce discrimination in hiring, law enforcement, healthcare, and countless other areas. The challenge will not only be making AGI intelligent but ensuring it is just, impartial, and aligned with ethical principles that uplift all of humanity.



The development of AGI will be the defining moment of our civilization. It has the power to elevate humanity beyond our wildest dreams or introduce risks we are not prepared to face. Whether we enter an era of enlightenment or destruction depends on the choices we make now. We must tread carefully, balancing innovation with wisdom, ensuring that AGI is not just powerful but aligned with the values that make us human.

This means establishing ethical frameworks that prioritize human dignity and survival. It means fostering global cooperation to prevent AGI from becoming an uncontrolled arms race. It means designing AGI to complement human intelligence rather than replace it entirely. And most importantly, it means confronting the deeper questions of meaning, purpose, and morality in an age where intelligence is no longer uniquely human.


The future belongs to intelligence. The question is—will it still belong to us?

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page